The BBC (and the UK media) is cheating us about British Military Terrorism in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya

In this blog I want to explore issues about how the Brtiish Broadcasting Corporation (and other parts of the UK media) are cheating the public.

There are, in my view, many areas of concern.

However, in the near future I anticipate focussing primarily on one hugely important issue - the silence of the BBC (and the UK media) on British Military Terrorism.

Over the last few years I have on dozens of occasions contacted BBC programmes and presenters raising the issue of British Military Terrorism in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya, among other places.

Without exception, sa far as I'm aware, the BBC has maintained its silence on the issue of British Military Terrorism.

What are the reasons for this failure of journalism by the BBC?

BBC bias? Islamophobia? A DA-Notice?

What are the effects of this BBC silence?

RAF terrorism in Iraq is ongoing. See, for example, RAF Terrorism in Iraq - Section 56 offences by David Cameron MP and Michael Fallon MP reported to West Midlands Police

The UK Treasury continues, unlawfully, to fund that terrorism without the knowledge or consent of the taxpaying British public.

If the BBC had asked this question in 2003 the Iraq War could have been avoided.

Hundreds of British soldiers who died in Iraq and Afghanistan as terrorists might still be alive.

Hundreds of British soldiers who lost limbs as terrorists in Iraq and Afghanistan might not have done so.

Thousands of Iraqi and Afghan civilians might be alive who died as a direct or indirect result of British Military Terrorism.

This monumental failure of BBC journalism has had many serious unwanted outcomes.

The BBC is cheating us about British Military Terrorism.